Thursday, February 12, 2009

Who threatens what harmony?

Geert Wilders has been banned from entering the UK. The reason stated is that Wilders' "presence in the UK would pose a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society" and that his "statements about Muslims and their beliefs, as expressed in
(film) Fitna and elsewhere, would threaten community harmony and therefore public security in the UK."

What interests would Wilders threaten? And in what way? Is he truly more threatening then somebody with links to Hezbollah, whom the UK considers a terrorist organization? Is Wilders truly a bigger danger to the British realm then one of it's peers that openly threatened with mob violence should the House of Lords screen Wilders' movie and discuss it? Apparenlty the latter are OK, it's Wilders who is the problem, the clear and present danger.

What was that song? "There'll always be an England"? I very much doubt it...

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Wilders is baned from UK because it is not politicaly correct to say what he is saying . England doesnot want to accept what Wilders says , although Wilder is telling the truth and is warning of the conseqences of refusing to accept the truth . England and the United States have a very short history of living with muslims . Where as the Balkans and the jews have a very long history of living amongst people of the muslim faith .